Public expenditures and environmental protection

Public expenditures and environmental protection

2000
About
Pigou's conjecture was that under costly taxation public expenditures should not reach the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs. In the treatment here, public expenditures (and environmental protection) may provide public goods for consumption but also collective inputs for production. When the benefits are in production, the cost of funds is irrelevant. Why? Collective inputs benefit goods that are taxed, while for public goods the shadow price of funds reduces provision as if they were.

Discuss Public expenditures and environmental protection with other readers

Join or start a book club for Public expenditures and environmental protection on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.

Frequently asked questions

How do I join a book club for Public expenditures and environmental protection?

Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Public expenditures and environmental protection as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.

Can I discuss Public expenditures and environmental protection with other readers online?

Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Public expenditures and environmental protection with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.

Is Readfeed free?

Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.