
Common knowledge?
About
This study describes the results of a six-year ethnographic research project on Wikipedia. It explains how Wikipedia's theoretically ahierarchical system may increase Wikipedians' perception of inequality in practice and how hierarchy is enacted through community elections. Although Wikipedia is sometimes portrayed as collaborative and peaceful, it often breaks into conflicts and disputes. The book describes how the gradual increase in editing participation determines its attractiveness, addictiveness, and, ultimately, its level of conflict.
Discuss Common knowledge? with other readers
Join or start a book club for Common knowledge? on Readfeed. Live chat, shared reading progress, and AI discussion questions — free to get started.
Frequently asked questions
How do I join a book club for Common knowledge??
Sign up free on Readfeed, then browse public clubs or start your own club with Common knowledge? as the current read. Invite friends with a share link and discuss together with live chat and AI discussion questions.
Can I discuss Common knowledge? with other readers online?
Yes. Readfeed book clubs let you chat live, share progress, and join discussions about Common knowledge? with readers worldwide — whether your club is virtual, in-person, or hybrid.
Is Readfeed free?
Yes. Creating an account and joining book clubs is free. Sign up to find readers who love the same books and start discussing today.